Measuring Results, Making Decisions, and Using Metrics
A good metric is information that changes the next action, rather than a number for reporting.
Output vs Outcome
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Output | Released 5 features |
| Adoption | Used by 40% of users |
| Outcome | Reduced task time by 25% |
| Impact | Increased retention / reduced support |
A PO should focus on outcomes more than outputs.
Metric Tree
flowchart TD
B[Business Goal] --> P[Product Outcome]
P --> U[User Behavior]
U --> M1[Leading Metric]
P --> M2[Lagging Metric]
Common Metric Types
Acquisition
Are users arriving?
Activation
Have they experienced the core value for the first time?
Engagement
Are they actually using it repeatedly?
Retention
Do they return?
Efficiency
Have time, clicks, and failures decreased?
Quality
Have crashes, errors, and support issues decreased?
Leading vs Lagging
Leading
= A behavioral indicator that anticipates future results
Lagging
= A final result that has already occurred
Example:
- Leading: Number of Camera Presets saved
- Lagging: Reduction in Camera Setup time
Metric Pitfalls
- Assuming that an increasing number is always good
- Measuring only what is easy to measure
- Looking only at averages and missing differences between segments
- Ignoring the possibility that increased usage reflects increased friction
- Turning a metric into a target and encouraging gaming
Decision-Making Framework
Evidence
↓
Interpretation
↓
Options
↓
Trade-off
↓
Decision
↓
Expected Result
↓
Measure
A decision log should record at least:
- What was decided
- What evidence supported it
- What was given up
- What results would cause the decision to change
For a PO, data is a tool for reducing uncertainty, not "the answer."